Comments for The Sympriser Blog

Comment on The Open/Closed Principle: Concerns about Change in Software Design by Rules are rules…or are they? « Form Follows Function

Rules are rules…or are they? « Form Follows Function — Wed, 30 Nov 2011 18:29:43 +0000

[...] in technology, you collect “rules” that guide the way you work. However, as a blogger noted: “Good design principles are usually helpful. But, are they always [...]

Comment on The Open/Closed Principle: Concerns about Change in Software Design by Open/Closed Principle in Software Design « linux-well

Open/Closed Principle in Software Design « linux-well — Thu, 04 Aug 2011 20:04:11 +0000

[...] http://blog.symprise.net/2009/06/open-closed-principle-concerns-about-change-in-software-design/ [...]

Comment on The Open/Closed Principle: Concerns about Change in Software Design by SOLID Programming Principles « It's a Virtual Life

SOLID Programming Principles « It's a Virtual Life — Thu, 24 Feb 2011 05:09:05 +0000

Useful links:
http://blog.symprise.net/2009/06/open-closed-principle-concerns-about-change-in-software-design/

Comment on The Open/Closed Principle: Concerns about Change in Software Design by Links, news, Resources: Object Oriented Programming (1) « Angel “Java” Lopez on Blog

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 09:38:06 +0000

[...] The Open/Closed Principle: Concerns about Change in Software Design This post investigates the applicability of the “Open/Closed Principle” when we add new functionality to a software design whose source code is entirely under our control. [...]

Comment on Revisiting Fowler’s Video Store: Variants and Invariants by Rafael Peixoto de Azevedo

Rafael Peixoto de Azevedo — Thu, 27 May 2010 03:17:22 +0000

Thanks, Mark

You are completely right! I made the mistake by manual intervention when moving the blog content from its former location. All the code in the blog was supposed to be invariant to this refactoring. Didn’t have proper tests in place!

Cheers, Rafael

Comment on Revisiting Fowler’s Video Store: Variants and Invariants by Mark Needham

Mark Needham — Wed, 26 May 2010 22:39:47 +0000

I guess this line:

if (simultaneous >= 3 && simultaneous >= 7) {

Should read:

if (simultaneous >= 3 && simultaneous <= 7) {

Interesting ideas though.

Comment on Revisiting Fowler’s Video Store: Refactoring Code, Refining Abstractions by The Sympriser Blog » Revisiting Fowler’s Video Store: Adopting Object Oriented Syntax

Wed, 12 May 2010 03:37:30 +0000

[...] Comments Sascha on Revisiting Fowler’s Video Store: Refactoring Code, Refining AbstractionsRaoul Duke on Revisiting Fowler’s Video Store: Refactoring Code, Refining AbstractionsRaoul [...]

Comment on Revisiting Fowler’s Video Store: Making Implicit Concepts Explicit by The Sympriser Blog » Revisiting Fowler’s Video Store: Adopting Object Oriented Syntax

Wed, 12 May 2010 03:34:35 +0000

[...] Duke on Revisiting Fowler’s Video Store: Refactoring Code, Refining AbstractionsRaoul Duke on Revisiting Fowler’s Video Store: Making Implicit Concepts ExplicitRafael Peixoto de Azevedo on Revisiting Fowler’s Video Store: Making Implicit Concepts [...]

Comment on Revisiting Fowler’s Video Store: Making Implicit Concepts Explicit by The Sympriser Blog » Revisiting Fowler’s Video Store: Refactoring Code, Refining Abstractions

Wed, 12 May 2010 02:17:24 +0000

Comment on Revisiting Fowler’s Video Store: Refactoring Code, Refining Abstractions by Sascha

Sascha — Mon, 08 Jun 2009 19:23:06 +0000

Very good post Rafael, thanks for the contribution for all of us!